Monday, February 1, 2010

Harvard Crimson Coverage of Cornell Blowout Win Over Harvard on Saturday


By Martin Kessler
Harvard Crimson
February 1, 2010

ITHACA, N.Y.—What was billed as the premier Ivy League matchup of the season failed to live up to the hype.



Instead of a back-and-forth battle between two title contenders, the sold-out crowd at Cornell’s Newman Arena witnessed the most lopsided Ivy League game of the season.

Rather than challenging the Big Red (18-3, 4-0 Ivy) for league dominance, the Harvard men’s basketball team (14-4, 3-1 Ivy) was trounced 86-50 in the Crimson’s worst loss since 2007.

“We didn’t play up to our capabilities and in a game like this, against a team like Cornell in this environment, we obviously need to play much better,” Harvard coach Tommy Amaker said.

Whether it was the raucous crowd, the game’s high stakes, Cornell’s stifling defense, or a combination of those factors, the young Crimson team was knocked out of its offensive rhythm, turning the ball over 25 times and shooting 36.1% from the field.

“We did everything we wanted to do defensively to make them struggle,” Big Red coach Steve Donahue said. “I do think we have the ability with our depth, our size, our experience, of being able to cause things like that on defense.”

Harvard co-captain Jeremy Lin struggled to control the ball, turning it over eight times. Lin had more success scoring, finishing with a game-high 19 points. But with no other Crimson players reaching double figures, Harvard failed to keep pace with a dynamic Big Red offense that had five different players finish with at least 10 points.

Seven-foot center Jeff Foote led Cornell with 16 points, nine rebounds, and four assists, scoring most of his baskets on post moves in the paint—including two flushes—against the Crimson’s undersized big men.

“I just felt like I had a little bit of an advantage,” Foote said. “I was catching it deep and getting good position. Today I was able to slow myself down, really gather myself, and go into my moves that I’m effective with.”

Amaker threw a number of different defensive looks at Foote in an attempt to slow the big man down. Amaker sent four different forwards to cover Foote man-to-man throughout the game and also switched to zone defense on several possessions.

But it was to no avail, as the reigning defensive player of the year was able to have his way on offense, knocking down 7-of-11 shots from the field.

“As we went through the scouting report, I mentioned I thought he’s the key to their team,” Amaker said. “I think he does so much dirty work. He scores on the inside; He’s a great passer, a very unselfish big man. I’m very fond of his game.”

On the other side of the ball, the Big Red attempted to slow Harvard’s strongest offensive player, Lin, by limiting his touches or doubling off screens to force the All-Ivy player into sending the ball to his teammates—or out of bounds.

Lin’s teammates failed to make the defense pay when Cornell double-teamed, as they collectively shot just 26% from the field.

Despite the offensive and defensive struggles and lopsided outcome, the Crimson was not without opportunities to get itself back in the game.

Cornell got out to a hot start, hitting its first six shots to open the contest, and a Foote spin move followed by a lefty floater over Harvard sophomore Andrew Van Nest gave the Big Red a 19-10 lead just under six minutes into the game.

But Harvard countered with a 7-0 run sparked by a layup from sophomore Keith Wright. Moments later, freshman Dee Giger knocked down an open deep ball to get within two after Wright recovered an offensive rebound and sent it back out to the wingman on the perimeter.

Cornell’s Mark Coury blew a layup on the Big Red’s next possession and the Crimson came away with the ball—and the opportunity to tie the score or take the lead.

Lin found Van Nest beyond the arc, but the big man’s shot attempt—Harvard’s only attempt in the game to take the lead—clanged off the rim.

Foote finished with a dunk on the other end, starting a 16-0 run for the Big Red, which would take a 38-24 lead into the break.

Six points from Lin to start the second half got the deficit back down to 10, but the Crimson would never get closer than that, as Cornell cruised to the 36 point victory.

“I think they’re an outstanding basketball team,” Amaker said. “One of the better teams in the country from what I’ve been able to see.”

ITHACA, N.Y.—The opening possession of Saturday night’s match up between men’s basketball heavyweights Cornell and Harvard was a fairly simple play.

The Big Red’s All-Ivy big man Jeff Foote received the ball in the post, paused, and then found a wide-open Chris Wroblewski, who drained a three-pointer and sent the home crowd into a frenzy.

Though only eight seconds had passed—and Crimson freshman guard Christian Webster would respond with a three of his own—the Crimson’s inability to defend the seven-foot Foote and prevent Cornell’s sharpshooters from getting open looks at the basket would haunt the road team until the final buzzer.

By all accounts, Foote, the most dominant big man in the Ancient Eight, stuffed the box score while stuffing dunks all over the opposition’s frontcourt personnel.

Harvard starters Keith Wright and Doug Miller, clearly at a sizeable physical disadvantage, were unable to stop the Big Red center from backing down his defender and lofting hooks and layups with ease.

Playing in only their second career league game on the road, reserves Andrew Van Nest and Kyle Casey proved to be even less effective on the interior.

The loss of senior forward Pat Magnarelli to a high-ankle sprain sustained last week at Dartmouth certainly did not help the Crimson’s efforts.

“This was a game where we really had to utilize Jeff,” Cornell coach Steve Donahue said. “They scramble around so well on defense that if you continue to do that, it wears you down. We have the luxury of just slowing things down, dumping it inside, making them guard.”

Mostly facing a single defender, Foote still managed to find the open man out on the perimeter—a strength shared by his teammates, as Harvard’s defensive troubles extended beyond just dealing with the big man.

The Big Red distributed the ball with incredible efficiency, continually finding its shooters good opportunities with dribble-drive penetration and stellar perimeter passing on the way to 22 assists.

The talent that had led Cornell to two consecutive Ivy titles was on full display. The 2007-08 Ivy Player of the Year Louis Dale used his quickness to get into the lane, either finishing at the hoop or passing to teammates on the outside. The Crimson’s perimeter defenders often failed to rotate quickly enough, giving the high-powered Big Red offense a chance to flex its muscles.

GIVING IT AWAY

The Crimson turned the ball over 30 times in a loss to Army, and for much of the game, it seemed the squad was intent on reaching that milestone again.

Harvard amassed 14 turnovers in the first half alone, doing so in almost every way possible.

Whether it was drawing offensive fouls, stripping penetrators on dribble drives, or picking off simply lazy passes, Cornell applied a defensive pressure that the opposing squad could not handle.

“They were very aggressive, they took us out of anything we wanted to run and knocked the ball off of us,” Crimson coach Tommy Amaker said. “Obviously having 25 turnovers and only seven assists is not a very good formula for positive basketball.”

Many of the give-aways—which led to 29 points for the opposition—resulted from a team-wide inability to hold onto the ball. Passes repeatedly went off of hands, dribbles went awry, and the raucous Newman Arena crowd ate it up.

As a result, Harvard struggled mightily on the offensive end. One of the league’s top offenses never found a stable rhythm and only took 32 shots from the field, compared to Cornell’s 66.

Giving up no fast break points, the Big Red also stopped Harvard from pushing the ball up into the open floor, one of the team’s strengths.

And the Crimson’s half-court offense ran into plenty of problems of its own, as the lack of a legitimate post presence and clutch shooters crippled the visitng team.

“We have guys that can guard on the perimeter and you have a kid like Jeff waiting there, so it’s difficult to keep penetrating, which they do,” Donahue explained.

On a night when the long-distance shots weren’t falling—the squad shot 33 percent from three—and Foote was bullying his way around inside, only Lin was able to successfully get into the lane and finish at the basket.

Harvard totaled 14 points in the paint to Cornell’s 32.

Bleacher Report: "Cornell's Thumping of Harvard Likely Makes Ivy a One-Bid League"


By Jameson Flemming
Bleacher Report
February 1, 2010

ITHACA, NY -- When you walk through the front doors of tiny Newman Arena, it's hard to imagine that the basketball game that's about to ensue will be a key determinant to whether the Ivy League receives two bids to the NCAA Tournament.



That was the case Saturday night as Cornell and Harvard took the floor in front of a sellout crowd of 4,473 people, including a student section that the players and coaches raved about.

Nearly two hours after it started, seldom-used reserve Miles Asafo-Adjei drilled a desperation three-pointer at the end of a shot clock to extend Cornell's lead to 85-48.

That's right. The Big Red pounded the Crimson by 36 in arguably the most important Ivy League game in ages. The aftermath left one thing clear.

“I feel very comfortable playing any team in the country on a neutral court with this group,” said Cornell coach Steve Donahue. “I feel that we’d fare well. I think that we have enough experience, size, skill, and toughness to compete with anybody in college basketball right now."

The Big Red should get its shot in March to beat anybody on a neutral court. The win allows Cornell to control its own destiny with 10 games left in a league without a conference tournament.

Win out and Cornell is guaranteed to make the tournament. If the Big Red were to lose to Harvard in a rematch in February, then lose a one game playoff to the Crimson, then Cornell could still make an argument it belongs in March.

This one game alone jumped the Big Red 15 spots in Kenpom.com's efficiency rankings to a solid 41st. If Cornell loses just the two games to Harvard, then Donahue's team would finish with a 28-5 record.

It would be a 28-5 team that Syracuse coach Jim Boeheim and Kansas coach Bill Self both raved about after playing. The same went for Harvard's Tommy Amaker who repeatedly hammered away how good this Cornell team is.

“Depth, talent, experience. And they play very hard,” Amaker said. “There’s nothing else to really say. I think they’re an outstanding basketball team. One of the better teams in the country, from what I’ve been able to see.”

Cornell did everything to take Harvard out of its game. Pressure defense limited star guard Jeremy Lin's touches as the senior finished with as many turnovers as points (four) in the first half.

Cornell made everybody else on the court besides Lin beat them, but the Crimson didn't have the weapons to do so. The Big Red doesn't have that problem.

Foul trouble limited the minutes and rhythm of the Big Red's star, Ryan Wittman who never got going in the first half.

"This is a group who doesn't care who scores," Donahue said. "It's really honestly true. There's not one guy who cares if he gets his points."

Saturday night was a perfect example. With Wittman not a factor, Cornell's guards frequently fed the post to seven footer Jeff Foote. Harvard was slow to double-team which gave Foote all the time in the world to back his smaller defender down and record five first-half field goals, including two thunderous dunks that sent the student section into a frenzy.

When Harvard finally doubled Foote, capable shooters Louis Dale and Jon Jaques took over from the perimeter to drill five of nine three-point shots. The aftermath of Cornell's balanced attack was a 16-0 run and a 14 point halftime lead.

The 36 point victory puts Cornell back on the national radar, which Cornell's players get a kick out of, but they also know the importance of national rankings.

“Coach says all the time that the ratings and all that don’t really matter to us. We have to focus on ourselves and get better every day,” Foote said.

He then smiled and finished his response.

“But it would be kinda cool to be in the top 25.”

Just think. An Ivy League school in the top 25 not for the quality of its academics, but for the quality of its basketball team.

If Cornell keeps winning, that's exactly where it will find itself.

Bleacher Report. "Kansas, Cornell's Paths Cross Again"

By Jameson Flemming
Bleacher Report
February 1, 2010

You'll Remember These Outcomes in March...

Kansas 81, Kansas State 79 and Cornell 86, Harvard 50

About three weeks ago, Cornell picked up arguably its best win of the season...by losing to the then top ranked Kansas Jayhawks. After holding the lead for most of that game, the Big Red eventually faltered, falling victim to Sherron Collins' vicious clutch moves in the paint.



Saturday, both teams once again crossed paths, but this time on two very different courts. In the Little Apple, Manhattan, Kansas, the Jayhawks entered the Octagon of Doom needing a victory to secure the top ranking and reaffirm themselves as the team to beat in March.

In tiny, quaint (and unbelievably cold) Ithaca, New York, Cornell hosted Harvard in tiny 4,000 seat Newman Arena. The Big Red needed a victory in arguably one of the most important games in the Ivy League in decades to further show the NCAA Selection Committee that Cornell is one of the top 65 teams in the country.

Both games tipped at 7:00 PM EST, but it was clear both games would produce drastically different results.

Kansas and Kansas State went back and forth with the lead rarely growing above five points for either squad.

Cornell and Harvard's hyped matchup didn't live up to the billing. The Big Red shut down star guard Jeremy Lin in the first half and Jeff "Seven" Foote electrified a boisterous student body with several early dunks and lay-ups.

At half, Lin had as many points as turnovers (four) and the Crimson trailed by 14. In Manhattan, the game was much closer. The Jayhawks led by one.

The second halves of each game were much of the same. Kansas and Kansas State would go to overtime where Kansas showed the tenacity to win it all. In front of the loudest crowd Sherron Collins said he's ever played in front of, Kansas squeaked out an overtime victory.

While the Jayhawks showed they can win a national title, Cornell was just demonstrating why they belong with the big boys. Syracuse coach Jim Boeheim has talked about Cornell as being a team that is as good as a five or six seed in the NCAA Tournament.

For more reaction to Cornell-Harvard read my column from Ithaca.

Additional Coverage of Cornell's Romp Over Harvard from the Ithaca Journal

Cornell's Adam Wire fouls Harvard's Jeremy Lin during the second half of their game Saturday evening in Newman Arena. Lin went on to lead Harvard to 19 points but it was Cornell's night with the score ending 86-50 in Cornell's favor.


By Brian Delaney
Ithaca Journal
February 1, 2010

ITHACA -- This was not a night when the Ivy League title was decided, especially considering Cornell's schedule finishes with six of its final eight games on the road.

But what Cornell did Saturday at Newman Arena, where a lively sold out crowd replenished the Big Red with waves of adrenaline, was send a clear message to its league brethren: Upstaging the two-time defending champions will be a mountainous task.



Cornell hit its first six shots, picked apart Harvard with its precision passing and balanced scoring, then compounded the Crimson's frustrations with an aggressive defense that made standout guard Jeremy Lin look pedestrian.

The Big Red led from start to finish in an emphatic 86-50 victory, its 16th win in 17 games.

"They're very, very good," Harvard coach Tommy Amaker said. "We knew that coming in, but seeing them first half obviously this season -- depth, talent, experience, and they play very hard. There's nothing else really to say. I think they're an outstanding basketball team and one of the better teams in the country from what I've been able to see."

Both programs spent the non-league portions of their schedules assembling impressive resumes. While Cornell (18-3, 4-0 Ivy) beat the likes of Alabama and St. John's, Harvard (14-4, 3-1) knocked off Boston College, George Washington and Rice. The terrific play of Lin, a top 30 finalist for the Wooden Award, along with Amaker's high-profile reputation catapulted the Crimson into the national spotlight.

But Lin and his supporting cast, which includes four freshmen regulars, found themselves overwhelmed by Cornell's experience, savvy and physicality.

Harvard committed 25 turnovers, 14 in the first half, which led to 29 Cornell points. Cornell coughed it up only eight times, and assisted on 22 of 30 baskets.

Jeff Foote's 16 points led five double-figure scorers. Although Harvard did a sound job on Ryan Wittman (11 points), it mattered little.

"It's a group that doesn't care who scores, and it's really honestly true," Cornell coach Steve Donahue said. "It's not like these guys are trying to get their points. Not one guy cares how it gets done."

Citing the lack of a conference tournament, Cornell tried to downplay the game's importance during the week. The team's body language suggested differently.

Typically reserved players, like Jon Jaques and Ryan Wittman, emoted after made shots or officials' calls they found questionable. Loose-ball scrums looked more like physical scrambles to recover fumbles in football, and Lin, in particular, was slow to his feet on more than one occasion following rugged collisions.

"I definitely felt like the intensity was high right from the get-go," said Louis Dale, who had 13 points, five assists and zero turnovers. "It felt like this was a huge game."

Harvard was still within striking distance with 12 minutes, 56 seconds remaining, trailing 46-36 following two Christian Webster free throws. Cornell then scored 17 straight, a run that began as a trickle but ended in a flood of 3-pointers from seniors Dale, Jaques and Wittman.

Harvard turned it over three straight times and missed two front ends of a one-and-one during that stretch.

The Crimson also struggled to handle Foote.

His rim-rattling, one-handed dunk over Doug Miller, followed by a right hook in the post ignited the first-half run that gave Cornell a 35-17 lead. Foote's night included nine rebounds, four assists and three blocked shots.

When Amaker ran an extra defender at the 7-footer, he generally found an open teammate. When Amaker didn't, Foote usually converted.

"I was able to get into my moves, and the lack of a double team really helped out," Foote said.

Amaker called Foote "the key" to Cornell's team.

"He does so much dirty work," Amaker said. "He scores on the inside, he's a great passer -- a very unselfish big man. I'm very fond of his game."

Cornell hasn't trailed over the last 221 minutes, 43 seconds -- a streak that spans 5 1/2 games. The Big Red's last deficit was 31-30 in the first half of a Jan. 8 game at South Dakota.

Cornell's four league wins have come by an average margin of 29 points. They've yet to surrender more than 53 points in that stretch. Junior forward Adam Wire has been helpful off the bench, and finished with five points, two rebounds, two assists and three steals in 14 minutes.

Lin scored 19 points, but picked up his fourth foul with 12:08 left and, for the second straight trip to Newman, finished with eight turnovers. He was held to just four first-half points on 1-for-2 shooting.

The game slowed in the second half, with the two teams getting whistled for 10 total fouls in the first three minutes. Twenty-eight fouls were called after halftime.

The rematch, scheduled for Feb. 19 in Cambridge, has already sold out.

Princeton (11-5, 2-0 Ivy) opened its Ivy schedule with a pair of road wins, and is expected to be a contender. The Tigers visit Harvard on Friday night, while Cornell hosts Yale.

Donahue called Harvard "a great team," but said he doesn't believe the league is a two-team race.

"People wanted to make this the Ivy League championship game," he said. "I've been in the league 20 years. I'm telling you, there's going to be a lot happening over the next 10 games."

Notes: Princeton won at Yale on Saturday, 58-45; Penn received a controversial tip-in at the buzzer from Dan Monckton to beat Brown, 55-54; Columbia snapped a five-game losing streak with a 63-51 win over Dartmouth.

By the Numbers

Cornell is off to a 4-0 start in Ivy League play, after Saturday night's 86-50 victory over Harvard. The numbers, to say the least, have been impressive:

* 29.3 -- Average margin of victory

* 0 -- Number of seconds Cornell has trailed

* 47.8 -- Opponents' points-per-game average

* 18 -- Consecutive league victories at home

* 27 -- Cornell's ranking, as of Jan. 25, in the ESPN / USA Today top 25 coaches poll.


At first, Jeff Foote attempted to downplay the importance of what a top 25 national ranking would mean for the Cornell men's basketball team.

"Like coach says all the time, the ratings and that kind of stuff doesn't matter to us," said Foote, the

Spencer-Van Etten graduate and senior center who led Cornell to its 16th victory in 17 games Saturday night, an 86-50 win over Harvard in front of a sold-out crowd at Newman Arena. "We want to focus on ourselves and get better every day. That's kind of for you guys."

Pause.

"But it would be kind of cool to get in the top 25."

There. That wasn't so hard, was it?

National ranking discussions are extremely rare for Ivy League basketball teams in the modern era, considering the league's lack of athletic scholarships and primary focus on academics. The last Ivy team to be ranked was Princeton in 1997-98.

But with each passing weekend, it appears the stars are aligning for Cornell. After a weekend sweep of Dartmouth and Harvard by a combined 70 points, the Big Red is 18-3 and on the cusp of its first national ranking since the 1950-51 season. Two of the team's losses are to No. 4 Syracuse and No. 2 Kansas. Harvard entered Saturday's game with a 14-3 record, which led to considerable attention from national media outlets during the week.

Cornell hasn't trailed once in its last 5 1/2 games.

"The only thing I would say is I feel very comfortable playing any team in the country on a neutral court with this group," Cornell coach Steve Donahue said. "I feel we would fare well."

The two main college basketball polls, the ESPN/USA Today top 25 coaches poll and Associated Press top 25, are updated every Monday afternoon. As of Jan. 25, Cornell had received 38 votes in the coaches' poll, which tied the Big Red for 27th overall along with New Mexico. Cornell was further down in the AP poll, slotted at 36th overall with 16 votes.

At least two teams, No. 19 Connecticut and No. 21 Clemson, are expected to drop out of the coaches' poll after suffering losses during the week. A third, No. 17 Pittsburgh, lost at South Florida on Sunday and could also depart.

New Mexico, which upset No. 10 Brigham Young University on Wednesday, and Baylor (37 votes), which won at No. 6 Texas on Saturday, are expected to make big leaps. After its 36-point victory over the Crimson, Cornell will be hard to ignore.

"It would be a great achievement for our team, definitely," senior point guard Louis Dale said. "It's something we definitely believe. We can be a top 25 team."

Update to the Jon Jaques Blog on the NY Times


By Jon Jaques
February 1, 2010

Jon Jaques is a senior on the Cornell basketball team. As he did last season, Jon will be blogging for The Quad throughout this season. You can also follow him on Twitter.


Though we have only played four conference games, it sure doesn’t feel like only three Ivy League weekends are in the books. The Ivy League basketball season resembles football’s Bowl Championship Series (minus the inevitable controversy) in that enormous emotional and physical stress and importance are placed on each game. The margin for error in this league is almost unfairly slim, which is why having eight seniors who know every game can make or break a season is crucial.

But an equally important (and rarely highlighted) benefit of having a veteran squad is the ability to enjoy moments off the court that other teams may not take advantage of. I truly believe that Cornell basketball’s rise over the past few seasons is due in large part to our ability to stay loose off the court. Before the skeptics jump all over my theory, allow me to provide a couple of examples from this season.

I’d estimate that 75 to 80 percent of the boosting of team morale occurs during road trips. These expeditions, especially ones of the Ivy League variety, are filled with free time on bus rides or in hotel rooms that seem to spark spontaneous activities that can kill an hour or two. After beating Columbia on the road in New York City last weekend we stuck “Hangover” in the bus’s DVD player. But on a bus ride of more than four hours, a one-and-a-half-hour movie can only provide so much entertainment. What do Ivy League athletes do to entertain themselves during the last two and half hours?

On this particular trek back to Ithaca, the senior guard Geoff Reeves decided it would be fun to see if he could fit his entire 6-foot-4, 180-pound frame into one of the baggage compartments above the seats in the back of our bus. If you are having trouble picturing that, maybe this will help (the kid in the picture might be half of Geoff’s size). After a few minutes, some pictures, and some laughs, the players at the back of the bus got predictably bored and was ready for a new distraction. Up stepped the senior forward/center Pete Reynolds, who fit his 6-8, 220-pound frame into the same space. This was probably not the smartest or the safest use of our time (especially for the guys sitting underneath the compartments being used as a bed), but it’s just the most recent example of our team using a little down time to have some fun.

I wouldn’t be surprised if other teams take part in their own random impulsive activities. After all college kids are college kids, whether they are at Cornell or Kansas (would Jeff Foote or Cole Aldrich fit in a bus compartment?). But I can’t imagine that they have as much fun as we do. I don’t want to give the wrong impression, our program does a great job of knowing when it’s time to go to work. But knowing how to pick your spots and have fun off the court undoubtedly improves our chemistry and unselfishness on it.

The national news media made a big deal of last Saturday’s matchup with Harvard, and though it was an important win and a big game it was just that: one game. The margin of victory, 86-50, does not make the rest of the season any easier for us. We still have 10 hard league games remaining, including a rematch with the Crimson on Feb. 19. All our 4-0 league start means is that we’re on the right path. Up next: Yale and Brown next weekend.

Injury Update on Whack, Vaughns, and Bennett

Some updates on Rashad Whack, Vertrail Vaughns and Paris Bennett's injuries:

Whack: After slipping in the shower and dislocating his left shoulder he will be out another 10-14 days.

Vaughns: They will ask for medical redshirt, he should get it

Bennett: Larranaga says "we're inquiring" about medical redshirt eligibility. Don't think he will get it because of when his season ending injury occurred, but I'm not 100% on the rules.

These updates come per Michael Litos Twitter and via the CAA coaches weekly teleconference

Bracketbuster Pairings Announced Today

Tonight on ESPNU the Bracketbuster pairings will be announced, however we still won't know the times or dates of the games until February 8. Andy Katz has his predictions for the CAA and the VCU Ram Nation Blog has a nice little chart with all the home and away teams listed with current RPI rankings. In previous years, current RPI rankings have been pretty accurate when trying to predict which teams will be matched together. So looking at the chart from the Ram Nation blog it would seem like College of Charleston (94), Buffalo (101), Wright State (112), and Indiana State (87) are all possible teams likely to be paired with the Patriots. None of these teams seem exciting but it's not like Mason is in the running for an at-large bid. The rules are different in terms of return games this year, they would not be played until the 2011-2012 season. My question, however, is will the Patriots' options be limited because they are planning this game for their homecoming and already have it on the calendar for Saturday February 20th.

I am not sure how likely it would be for Mason to get a TV game on any of th ESPN networks outside of ESPN360, if you consider that TV. The Patriots have done all they can with their conference schedule so far and currently sit alone in 1st place in a conference that is ranked 12th in the country so far. Do they select the Patriots for a TV game with someone else who is currently at the top their conference, someone like Akron or Charleston? You would think they would want a team that is currently rolling to face another hot streaking team but RPI numbers could be a big factor.

My prediction: College of Charleston

What are your predictions?

UPDATE: CAASports.com is reporting Mason, ODU, VCU, and W&M have been chosen for TV games in Bracketbusters.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Hosted Desktops